"Independents are not stopped by their thinking"The question is not the idea, is if you have declared independence unilaterally skipping what the Constitution
The picture is worth more than a repetitive argument and shows the sensitivity of the author
WE MUST NOT HIDE THE TRUTH
Macabre torture used by the CIA to interrogate terrorism suspects in secret jails during the Presidency of George Bush emerged Tuesday. The report is the product of research conducted over four years by the Senate Intelligence Committee. The intelligence services tried repeatedly to torpedo its publication. The State Department opposed until the last moment its publication on the grounds that could result in retaliation against American overseas interests because because it denies the arguments of the Bush administration and the Agency defending the Repertoire of crimes in the name of security. «Reinforced interrogation techniques were effective for information correct "and denies that this information would serve to 'abort' attacks.If it had not been for the courage of Dianne Feinstein, the outgoing Chair of the Intelligence Committee, (who fought against the opposition of Republicans and resisted pressure from the White House to restrict as little as possible the declassified document), the document possibly not had come to light. "History will judge us by our commitment to a society governed by law and our will to confront the ugly truth and say: 'Never again'", said yesterday in his appearance in the Senate.The CIA, on the other hand, tried to subtract credibility to the document ensuring that «it has only a part of the truth» and has "too many shortcomings to become the official record of the program".
freedom of expression is not incompatible with respect for the person who has ideas would count ours. When someone uses the personal insult and even the threat rather than explaining solid and logical their views arguments, is skipping the red line and that, in a democratic society can not afford and are considered a crime how we see on social networks where is doing habitual reading these threats. And even if not, the threatening e isulta personalemete his opponent shows its low human
Hitler also believed that his regime was a democracy because it managed to drag the masses to his Nazi thinking. Within the same country citizens have different ideologies and backgrounds and the Jews of the Israeli parliament who are against the discrimnación of citizens by origin, religion or ideology are no less Jews that Jews who consider indispensable racial purity to be first-class citizen. We have not learned the errore Nazis who sought to exterminate the Jewish people
Hitler also had the majority. Fortunately, not all Germans thought like Hitler and the minority with international support stopped the madness of the dictator who, as usual with dictators, spread his madness to the masses. I want the sensible minority of Israel Parliament, with international support, wins out over the fanatical majority. We should all remember that ultra-nationalism and religious fanaticism have promoted the greatest crimes throughout history
all crimes are crimes : crimes of the Islamic state or crímes of Israel or any other state.. Humans are the only animals murderers.
Israel’s Cabinet on Sunday gave its approval to legislation defining Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people, a measure critics decried as racist and a threat to democracy
The moves were likely to fuel tensions between Israel and its Arab citizens, who make up about 20% of the population, and between Israeli authorities and the 300,000 Palestinians who live in East Jerusalem, which was annexed by Israel in 1967 in a move that was not internationally recognized. Most of the Palestinians have residency rights but not citizenship.But most observers see short-term coalition politics as the driving force behind the current debate, as Netanyahu jockeys to consolidate his support among his right-wing base, and more centrist elements of his government gird themselves for a confrontation, perhaps as early as this week, that could lead to a splintering of the ruling coalition
A war crime is a serious violation of the laws and customs of war (also known as international humanitarian law) giving rise to individual criminal responsibility. Examples of war crimes such as: murdering, mistreating, or deporting civilian residents of an occupied territory , killing hostages wantonly destroying cities, towns, villages, or any object not warranted by military necessity Article 22 of The Hague IV ("Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907") states that: "The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited." Over the last century, many other treaties have introduced positive laws that place constraints on belligerents. Some of the provisions, such as those in the The Hague and the Geneva Conventions and the Genocide Convention, are considered to be part of customary international law, and are binding on all. Others are only binding on individuals if the belligerent power to which they belong is a party to the treaty which introduced the constraint.
The glorifying terrorism is terrorism discourse, whether spoken or written in defense or praise of acts or terrorism. Not an apology or an opinion on these practices or their executors, but a defense alignment with these behaviors. It is an aggravation of entrapment, which is also in itself a criminal practice, but its special character is classified and grief with increased strength. The vast majority of criminal codes punish these practices by its inductive nature and the close relationship with the figure of the mastermind. The main reason to see this is a crime that no one can use your words to praise criminal acts because it can contribute to more crimes of this or similar nature.
In many states there are terrorist groups and even paramilitary groups are state´s are state´s terrorism. All kinds of terrorism is reprehensible. And there are some states that do not need paramilitary terrorist groups because it is a terrorist state occupying land that is not theirs and massacring innocent people. Against all forms of terrorism, we must cry all we do not support barbarism or our state or the other. And who advocates any kind of terrorism (state or otherwise) with his words becomes an accomplice of terrorism. The defense of terrorism is a crime. And it should be tried in international courts. IE executions are terrorism, massacres in Gaza are terrorist. Anyone who defends them is a terrorist and should report it. Freedom of ideas does not mean freedom to commit crimes
The UN commission calls on Israel to end "without conditions" to its settlement policy "Transfer its own population to occupied territory is against the right to self-determination and if we have a map we see settlements break the continuity of Palestinian land," said Chanet in a press conference. In response, the research team adopted in March 2012 by the Human Rights Council of the UN, demands that "Israel should, in accordance with Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention to end all settlement policy without conditions
Israel has built 62% of the wall declared il•legal for the UNThe layout annexs Palestinian land, 10 years after the sentence Nabi Samwil (Cisjordània) | Updated the 06/10/2014 00. 200 inhabitants of the small village of Nabi Samwil, to the north of Jerusalem, are conscious that the dictamen of the International Court of Justice (TIJ) will not apply never. This 2014 does precisely ten years that this maximum judicial organ of the UN declared that the wall that the Israeli government pretended to raise to the busy Cisjordània was il•legal, breached the humanitarian international right and benefited the assentaments Israeli.
Israel has built 62% of the wall declared il•legal for the UNThe layout annexs Palestinian land, 10 years after the sentence Nabi Samwil (cisjordània) | Updated the 06/10/2014 00. 200 inhabitants of the small village of Nabi Samwil, to the north of Jerusalem, are conscious that the dictamen of the International Court of Justice (TIJ) will not apply never. This 2014 does precisely ten years that this maximum judicial organ of the UN declared that the wall that the Israeli government pretended to raise to the busy Cisjordània was il•legal, breached the humanitarian international right and benefited the assentaments Israeli.
πολύ ωραίο, Σοφία
Μάλιστα μόνο αυτό μπορεί να μας σώζει τους καημένους ανθρώπους που χάσαμε το νου και την καρδιά μας.
Απο μια ισπανιδα που αγαπει την Ελλαδα, τους παλιους ελληνες που μας ανοιξαν την οδο στη λογοτεχνια, την καλητεχνια, τη φιλοσοφια και εβαλαν τα θεμελια του πολιτισμου οχι μονο στην Ευρωπη αλλα και σ ολον το συμπαν. Αλλα και τους ελληνες οχι τοσο παλιους που παλεψαν για την ελευερια της χωρας τους αλλα και την ολης της Ευρωπης και ακομη σημερα παλευουνε για να δειξουν τον κοσμο πως δεν ειναι τα λεφτα αλλα το πνευμα που μας κανει ανθρωπους. και κανενας δεν μπορει να μας παρει την αξιοπρεπια μας ουτε συτον τον καιρο που οι βλακες μπρεδευουν τα λεφτα με την αξια.Σοφια, Βασιλικη, Μανο, Σπυρο και οσοι ελληνες μπαινουν σ´ αυτον τον ωραιο σιτε .Σας ευχομαι τα καλυτερα για σας και για τη χωρα σας, και ειμαι σιγουρη θα τα καταφερετε....